![](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/db72a33d-b88c-4b5f-a966-f857a532c19f/Board-Internal-Investigations-1-scaled.jpg)
Insights & Regulatory Updates
![October 2024 Regulatory Update](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1728353989654-92GXQSMWZI0L0QXL6D47/cusip_rule_10.jpg)
October 2024 Regulatory Update
This update delves into recent shifts at the SEC, including leadership changes, policy updates, and enforcement actions that highlight the agency’s ongoing focus on compliance and investor protection. Keith Cassidy has taken over as Acting Director of the Division of Examinations, while Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the Enforcement Division, has announced his departure.
![Securities Enforcement Forum Central 2024 Recap: SEC Enforcement Trends and Strategic Priorities](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1728353268694-055IK03UUUMLLX9DI275/securities_docket_logo.jpeg)
Securities Enforcement Forum Central 2024 Recap: SEC Enforcement Trends and Strategic Priorities
The Securities Enforcement Forum Central 2024 delivered high-impact discussions on the future of SEC enforcement. With hundreds of top industry professionals gathered at the Ritz-Carlton Chicago, attendees gained exclusive insights into the SEC’s evolving priorities and key challenges—just days before the agency’s fiscal year-end. Highlights included a keynote with the SEC’s Chicago Regional Director, Tina Diamantopoulos, and panels featuring current and former senior SEC officials. Topics ranged from the implications of SEC v. Jarkesy and increased scrutiny on crypto assets, to insider trading strategies and cooperation credit standards.
![Avoiding Fundraising Pitfalls: A Securities Lawyer’s Guide for Startups Raising Capital](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727926279007-PQJG7Y1EEPYT7K472YLK/180516153902-start-investing-640x360.jpg)
Avoiding Fundraising Pitfalls: A Securities Lawyer’s Guide for Startups Raising Capital
For many entrepreneurs, raising capital is a necessary step toward building and scaling a successful business. However, raising capital isn’t just about convincing investors of your company’s potential—it’s also about navigating a complex web of federal and state securities laws. Failing to adhere to these regulations can result in serious consequences, ranging from penalties and rescission rights for investors to long-term barriers that impede your ability to raise funds down the road.
![Interagency Statement on Supervisory Practices for Financial Institutions Affected by Hurricane Helene](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727925197103-QD77PF4E3PJHU3NJX9YU/NCUA-Seal-e1556057751447.jpg)
Interagency Statement on Supervisory Practices for Financial Institutions Affected by Hurricane Helene
In light of the widespread damage and disruptions caused by Hurricane Helene, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Federal Reserve Board (FRB), the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and state financial regulators have issued an interagency statement to provide regulatory guidance and relief to financial institutions operating in the impacted regions.
![DOJ Takes Aim at Visa’s Dominance in Debit Card Market: Antitrust Lawsuit Alleges Anti-Competitive Tactics](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727924440358-QE4346HE7JQS7Y0IGG6G/Visa-750x406.jpg)
DOJ Takes Aim at Visa’s Dominance in Debit Card Market: Antitrust Lawsuit Alleges Anti-Competitive Tactics
The U.S. Department of Justice has launched an antitrust lawsuit against Visa, accusing the payments giant of exploiting its dominance in the debit card market to stifle competition and impose exorbitant fees on consumers and businesses. The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, claims that Visa uses its market power to pressure merchants, banks, and financial institutions into using its proprietary payment processing network, resulting in billions of dollars in fees that are ultimately passed on to consumers.
![From Likes to Lawsuits: FINRA Flags Compliance Pitfalls in Influencer Marketing and Crypto Promotions](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727924032442-DMINK7ANYBVJT0AJZAKW/Adllins-Media-Social-Marketing-Platforms.jpg)
From Likes to Lawsuits: FINRA Flags Compliance Pitfalls in Influencer Marketing and Crypto Promotions
With social media influencers dominating the advertising space and crypto assets all the rage, it's no surprise that financial firms are exploring new ways to reach clients and promote products. However, the recent insights from FINRA’s Advertising Regulatory Conference highlight a cautionary tale for firms rushing to leverage these trendy marketing tactics: proceed with caution, and bring your compliance team along for the ride.
![SEC Announces Departure of Enforcement Director Gurbir S. Grewal; Sanjay Wadhwa Named Acting Director, Sam Waldon Named Acting Deputy Director](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727914469814-R3ZGV3MSHZV28B3NQ2SB/Gurbir_Grewal_SEC.jpg)
SEC Announces Departure of Enforcement Director Gurbir S. Grewal; Sanjay Wadhwa Named Acting Director, Sam Waldon Named Acting Deputy Director
On October 2, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced the departure of Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the Division of Enforcement, effective October 11, 2024. Following his departure, Sanjay Wadhwa, the current Deputy Director of the Division, will step into the role of Acting Director. Meanwhile, Sam Waldon, Chief Counsel of the Division, will assume the position of Acting Deputy Director.
![Key Takeaways from SEC Fraud Charges Against the Kubient Officers](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727914167184-WI2TRP1OS600R7SC9Z82/kubient--600.png)
Key Takeaways from SEC Fraud Charges Against the Kubient Officers
In early October, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed accounting fraud charges in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the CEO, CFO, and Audit Committee Chair of Kubient, Inc. Kubient, a technology company that claims to employ artificial intelligence to detect fraud in digital advertising, is now at the center of an enforcement action highlighting serious governance failures at the highest levels of management.
![SEC Charges Accountant Olayinka Oyebola and His Firm With Aiding and Abetting Massive Fraud](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727800854875-9F4O4APZV1BEYQJ4ZKCH/SEC_filings_large.original.jpg)
SEC Charges Accountant Olayinka Oyebola and His Firm With Aiding and Abetting Massive Fraud
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken significant enforcement action against Olayinka Oyebola and his accounting firm, Olayinka Oyebola & Co. (Chartered Accountants), alleging their role in a sprawling securities fraud orchestrated by Mmobuosi Odogwu Banye, a businessman with an ambitious—and, it turns out, fictitious—empire of U.S.-based companies.
![SEC Charges Keurig Over Misleading Recyclability Claims of K-Cup Pods](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727757393902-UD9OYGOI1E8WJ9NBNHX6/SEC4-1024x602.jpg)
SEC Charges Keurig Over Misleading Recyclability Claims of K-Cup Pods
On September 10, 2024, the SEC charged Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (Keurig) with making misleading statements regarding the recyclability of its widely used K-Cup coffee pods. The action is part of the SEC’s ongoing initiative to combat “greenwashing”—the practice of making exaggerated or unsubstantiated claims about a company’s environmental practices or products.
![SEC Enforcement Sweep Targets Companies and Insiders for Late Filings under Section 16 and 13(d), (g), and (f)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727756582909-C69O4KQZSK15VAPCHSAU/chinese-ipos-sec-47253.jpg)
SEC Enforcement Sweep Targets Companies and Insiders for Late Filings under Section 16 and 13(d), (g), and (f)
The SEC’s fiscal year is winding down, and once again, we are seeing what is becoming a predictable, if not formalized, year-end tradition: a broad Enforcement sweep targeting companies and insiders for failing to meet timely filing requirements under Sections 16(a), 13(d), 13(g), and 13(f) of the Exchange Act. This year, 23 respondents—both corporate entities and individuals—were charged for violations stemming from late short-swing trading reports (Forms 3, 4, and 5) and beneficial ownership reports (Schedules 13D and G). Penalties ranged from $10,000 to $750,000, totaling more than $3.8 million. The SEC’s use of data analytics to identify these reporting failures continues to demonstrate the agency’s commitment to leveraging technology to enforce even technical compliance obligations.
![New FinCEN AML Rule Brings Heightened Scrutiny to Registered and Exempt Reporting Investment Advisers](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727051906574-S54ZBMO1DIIKXTF0EKOO/new-york-city-money-subway-new-york-nyc-big-apple-stocks-wall-street_t20_oEPGkR-1024x683.jpg)
New FinCEN AML Rule Brings Heightened Scrutiny to Registered and Exempt Reporting Investment Advisers
On August 28, 2024, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) finalized a rule that imposes new Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) program requirements on registered investment advisers (RIAs) and exempt reporting advisers (ERAs). For the first time, these advisers will be formally recognized as “financial institutions” under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), and thus subject to its AML/CFT regulations. The new rule will go into effect on January 1, 2026, signaling a significant shift for both RIAs and ERAs, who will need to implement comprehensive compliance programs to meet these requirements.
![SEC Updates Dollar Threshold for Qualifying Venture Capital Funds: What It Means for the Industry](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727051210609-AM8FDZ84LJB1YHOVFSUN/106941532-16316341932021-09-14t153527z_2081967076_rc2bpp99wqkq_rtrmadp_0_usa-congress-sec.jpeg)
SEC Updates Dollar Threshold for Qualifying Venture Capital Funds: What It Means for the Industry
On August 22, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted a new rule that updates the dollar threshold for a fund to be considered a "qualifying venture capital fund" under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The rule raises the threshold from $10 million to $12 million in aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital, reflecting inflation adjustments mandated by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018.
![The Aftermath of PFAR’s Demise: Navigating Private Equity Compliance in a New Regulatory Landscape](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727050693043-CT5IPKNMHOA9IGBZ9KIX/49798737252_7ca696fc94_o.jpeg)
The Aftermath of PFAR’s Demise: Navigating Private Equity Compliance in a New Regulatory Landscape
The recent vacating of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Private Fund Adviser Rules (PFAR) by the Fifth Circuit Court has sent ripples through the private equity (PE) industry. What was initially viewed as a burdensome regulatory overhaul for PE firms is now seen as a moment of reprieve, but also a pivotal point that raises larger questions about the future of SEC oversight. While many private equity firms are breathing a sigh of relief, this regulatory pause is unlikely to signal the end of increased scrutiny from the SEC. In fact, firms may need to prepare for a more nuanced and evolving approach to compliance in the wake of PFAR’s collapse.
![Untangling the SEC's Web: Regulatory Challenges Facing Crypto and Digital Assets](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727047910501-10LRA1AAOX16G0PSVDDU/f1rGh3mhhk-oj1fj1qjwJ56U37_dJ-MGTGGFHzBp25Q.jpg)
Untangling the SEC's Web: Regulatory Challenges Facing Crypto and Digital Assets
Under the leadership of Chairman Gary Gensler, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has adopted an approach to digital assets that some have described as "enforce first, make rules never." This strategy, while potentially effective in areas where clear guidance exists, has left digital asset market participants in the United States facing significant regulatory uncertainty. Without clear rules, the SEC’s aggressive enforcement tactics have had the effect of stifling innovation and driving businesses overseas. This article explores the key issues in the SEC’s current stance on digital assets and the need for a more thoughtful and predictable regulatory framework.
![Elizabeth Warren Questions FINRA's Enforcement Decline: Key Considerations for Companies](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727047080897-1YB1UHB74EVWYU1M3LDN/Elizabeth+Warren-US+senator-MA-1.png)
Elizabeth Warren Questions FINRA's Enforcement Decline: Key Considerations for Companies
On August 29, 2024, Senator Elizabeth Warren raised concerns regarding a sharp decline in enforcement actions by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). In a letter to FINRA CEO Robert Cook, Warren questioned whether this drop reflects a deliberate shift in regulatory strategy. The number of enforcement actions last year was the lowest since FINRA’s inception in 2007, and fines have similarly decreased. Warren’s inquiry highlights potential implications for both FINRA’s oversight and the broader regulatory landscape.
![Navigating the Complexities of Rule 13f-2 Compliance: Preparing for New Data Management Challenges](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727054536503-71CY7V09QRX62UZ1BHM5/SEC-Building_smaller-version.png)
Navigating the Complexities of Rule 13f-2 Compliance: Preparing for New Data Management Challenges
As the clock ticks down toward the January 2025 compliance deadline for SEC Rule 13f-2, institutional investment managers face an unprecedented regulatory challenge. This new rule, aimed at increasing transparency around short-selling activities, represents a significant shift from existing reporting frameworks, leaving firms grappling with how to overhaul their data management and reporting systems.
![Strengthening Whistleblower Protections: SEC Enforcement and Key Actions for Companies](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727046620701-374C25K1HDRJJQPC9BI7/Anonymous-Whistleblower-Versus-Confidential-Whistleblower.jpg)
Strengthening Whistleblower Protections: SEC Enforcement and Key Actions for Companies
On September 9, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced settlements with seven public companies for violations of whistleblower protections under Rule 21F-17 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This latest enforcement action underscores the SEC's growing commitment to ensuring whistleblowers can report potential securities violations without fear of retaliation or obstruction. Companies are now called to reassess their policies to comply with these important protections.
![SEC's Push for Sanctions Against Elon Musk: Implications for Corporate Governance](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1727045844056-WP0F3ME8I0QBK7VRMIWM/2OQRWSJ7XBKSRPME4OQLSZVF2Y.jpg)
SEC's Push for Sanctions Against Elon Musk: Implications for Corporate Governance
On September 20, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced its intention to seek sanctions against Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX and owner of X (formerly Twitter). This move comes in light of Musk’s failure to comply with a court order to testify regarding his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter. The implications of this case extend beyond Musk himself, raising significant questions about corporate governance, transparency, and the responsibilities of high-profile executives.
![Equity Crowdfunding: A Comparison of Reg A, Reg CF, and Reg D](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66bbb773a4f8d343ac7a3f52/1726809793779-DC4QIZ06T2QJGV65WV0J/shutterstock_696138958.0.jpg)
Equity Crowdfunding: A Comparison of Reg A, Reg CF, and Reg D
In the ever-evolving landscape of modern capital formation, the avenues available to entrepreneurs are both myriad and complex. Navigating the regulatory intricacies of Regulation A (Reg A), Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF), and Regulation D (Reg D) transcends mere compliance; it is a strategic imperative that can profoundly shape the trajectory of a business. Each regulatory framework not only delineates specific parameters regarding investor eligibility and funding caps but also carries distinct implications for ongoing disclosure and market engagement.