Regulatory Update: SEC Staff Guidance Eases Broker-Dealer Path Into Digital Asset Markets
On May 15, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Trading and Markets (“Staff”) published a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) offering long-awaited clarity for SEC-registered broker-dealers and transfer agents engaging in crypto asset-related activities.
Issued alongside FINRA and accompanied by the formal withdrawal of the 2019 Joint Staff Statement on Broker-Dealer Custody of Digital Asset Securities, this update is a meaningful step forward. It signals the Staff’s intent to move past defensive postures and toward practical, systems-level integration of crypto asset infrastructure into the legacy securities framework.
To be clear: the FAQs don’t alter statutory obligations or override the SEC’s 2020 Special Purpose Broker-Dealer (“SPBD”) Statement. But what they do provide is a viable, operational path for traditional broker-dealers to custody crypto asset securities—without siloed carveouts or regulatory acrobatics.
Let’s break down what matters, and why this shift should be on the radar of every compliance officer, digital asset GC, and prime services executive with an eye on the evolving intersection of finance and blockchain.
Conducting a Tokenized Offering Under Reg A
While there are multiple frameworks available to launch and distribute tokens—including those designed to avoid classification as securities—many of our clients elect to offer tokens as securities for strategic reasons. This can include unlocking broader investor participation, enabling secondary market liquidity, or building long-term institutional trust. Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) are the two primary exemptions that allow for the public issuance of security tokens under U.S. law.
Broker-Dealers vs. Unregistered Finders in Capital Raising
Determining whether an intermediary operates as a finder or an unregistered broker-dealer is a nuanced and fact-specific inquiry that can present significant challenges. For unwary entrepreneurs, corporate executives, and equity fund sponsors, the stakes are high; engaging a third party that inadvertently crosses the line into broker-dealer territory can result in serious regulatory repercussions.
Broker-Dealer Fined $3M for Trading Supervision Failures
In a recent settlement with FINRA, a major broker-dealer agreed to pay over $3 million in monetary sanctions due to supervisory failures related to short-term trading recommendations. These trading activities, which spanned a two-year period from January 2017 to December 2018, resulted in client losses while generating significant profits for the firm.
Former Broker Fined for Alleged Stock Hype in Client Emails: A Cautionary Tale for Advisors
On August 28, 2024, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced the suspension and fining of Richard Joseph Jackson, a former broker, for allegedly engaging in misleading communications with clients regarding stock performance. This case underscores the critical importance of compliance with FINRA’s communication rules, particularly for financial professionals responsible for advising clients.
Understanding FINRA's Membership Application Program: A Guide to Joining the Broker-Dealer Industry
In the world of securities trading, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) plays a crucial role in maintaining market integrity and protecting investors. One of the key components of this oversight is FINRA’s Membership Application Program (MAP). Here, we delve into what MAP entails, the process firms must go through to gain membership, and the role it plays in safeguarding the industry.