EXCELLENCE. EXPERIENCE. EXECUTION.

On July 1, 2025, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a comprehensive staff statement clarifying its views on disclosure obligations under the federal securities laws for issuers of crypto asset exchange-traded products (ETPs). While the products themselves represent novel financial structures—trust-based vehicles holding spot crypto or derivatives—the statement emphasizes continuity in legal obligations: crypto ETP issuers must adhere to well-established disclosure requirements under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For me and other experts who practice in this space, this was a bit of a "well duh" moment. But given the culminating momentum in the crypto space following the increasingly positive sentiment overall towards the digital assets industry, the Commission was right to make this clear. In a clear-eyed statement issued July 9, 2025, SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce addressed the increasing prevalence of tokenized securities, emphasizing that while the underlying technology may be novel, the applicable laws are not.

The digital asset ecosystem is entering a defining period—where legislative clarity, regulatory nuance, and litigation risk are converging. As crypto markets stabilize following years of enforcement-heavy scrutiny, U.S. regulators are offering more detailed guidance. New legislation and thoughtful statements from key regulators point toward a maturing legal environment—one that retains rigor while opening pathways for innovation. At the same time, market participants must navigate a shifting landscape marked by technological complexity, state-level litigation risks, and intensifying disclosure obligations.

This update provides a unified view of where the industry is now—from Congress and the SEC to private litigation—and what legal counsel should be preparing for next.

On May 15, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Trading and Markets (“Staff”) published a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) offering long-awaited clarity for SEC-registered broker-dealers and transfer agents engaging in crypto asset-related activities.

Issued alongside FINRA and accompanied by the formal withdrawal of the 2019 Joint Staff Statement on Broker-Dealer Custody of Digital Asset Securities, this update is a meaningful step forward. It signals the Staff’s intent to move past defensive postures and toward practical, systems-level integration of crypto asset infrastructure into the legacy securities framework.

To be clear: the FAQs don’t alter statutory obligations or override the SEC’s 2020 Special Purpose Broker-Dealer (“SPBD”) Statement. But what they do provide is a viable, operational path for traditional broker-dealers to custody crypto asset securities—without siloed carveouts or regulatory acrobatics.

Let’s break down what matters, and why this shift should be on the radar of every compliance officer, digital asset GC, and prime services executive with an eye on the evolving intersection of finance and blockchain.

Matt Levine’s latest Money Stuff column dissects a fascinating and increasingly common financial arrangement that blurs the line between traditional equity, tokenized instruments, and synthetic exposure: Republic’s tokenized forward tied to SpaceX stock.

In a move that signals regulatory recalibration, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has paused litigation surrounding its Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) — a long-debated, market-wide surveillance system that has drawn growing criticism from investors, industry participants, and conservative watchdogs. The SEC’s pause suggests that the agency may be open to modifying or even scaling back one of the most ambitious trade monitoring initiatives in modern market history.